Improvement of roughness in ultrasonic assisted magnetorheological finishing of small titanium alloy nuts by orthogonal test method | Scientific Reports

Oct 26, 2024

Scientific Reports volume 14, Article number: 9311 (2024) Cite this article

770 Accesses

2 Citations

Metrics details

Titanium alloy with high corrosion resistance, high strength-to-density ratio, and excellent biocompatibility has a wide range of applications in the field of biomedical implants. Polishing experiments of titanium alloy with a small size and complex shapes were investigated using an ultrasonic assisted magnetorheological finishing (UMRF) device excited by a three-pole magnetic field generator. The models of the normal force and the shear force were first proposed based on the Preston equation to analyze the mechanism of material removal in the UMRF process. Subsequently, the single-factor experiments using titanium alloy nuts (M3) and the MR polishing fluid with silicon carbide abrasives were carried out. Furthermore, to improve the surface roughness and the change rate of surface roughness of nuts, orthogonal tests with a standard L9(34) orthogonal array were designed and performed based on the optimized process parameters obtained from the single-factor experiment. The results indicated the effect on surface roughness and change rate of surface roughness as applied current > roller speed > ultrasonic amplitude > spindle speed and applied current > roller speed > spindle speed > ultrasonic amplitude, respectively. Moreover, the surface roughness was improved from an initial 1.247 μm to a final 0.104 μm after the polishing for 80 min under these optimal process parameters.

Titanium alloy is an alloy composed of titanium and other elements, which has the advantages of a high strength-to-density ratio, high corrosion resistance, and excellent biocompatibility1,2. These excellent characteristics bring a bright application in modern industry, such as aircraft compressor discs and turbine blades, orthopedic implants, surgical instruments, and medical instruments3,4. Producing artificial screws/nuts with high performance using titanium alloy means acquiring good surface quality, which can reduce the entry of corrosion products into the body5,6. Furthermore, the requirements of a higher reliability and longer life for orthopedic implants can be met by obtaining a surface with lower damage and higher finish7. However, the artificial screws/nuts have the characteristics of small size and complex shape, which makes it difficult to obtain high accuracy. In addition, it is very difficult to obtain high-quality surfaces for titanium alloys due to the properties of the material itself of high hardness and poor thermal conductivity. Therefore, it is one of the technical problems to be solved urgently in ultra-precision polishing of artificial screw/nut.

Magnetorheological fluid (MR) is a smart material8,9, and it has been extensively used in MR dampers, MR finishing, MR clutches, etc.10,11,12,13. MR finishing, which uses the MR effect to form a "flexible polishing brush" on the surface of the polishing tool, is a typical flexible finishing technology14,15,16. It overcomes the shortcomings of easy pollution, low efficiency and low controllability of traditional electrochemical polishing17,18, magnetic abrasive finishing19,20, ultrasonic polishing technology21,22, and has advantages of high surface quality, low surface damage, high efficiency, low energy consumption, controllable material removal rate, etc.23,24,25. It has been successfully used in industrial production for ultra-precision machining of optical surfaces and semiconductor wafers26,27. For example, the surface roughness of optical glasses can reach Ra 0.86nm at a wheel speed of 1256 mm s−1 of wheel speed and magnetic field intensity of 15.92 kA m−1 by MR finishing27. This means that ultra-precision polishing of parts using MR fluids can be achieved by appropriate methods or devices.

According to the structure and magnetic field excitation principle, the existing MR finishing methods can be divided into two types. The MR finishing can be achieved by a "small grinding head" formed on the polishing wheel/ball by the MR polishing fluid having a local "spots" contact with the workpiece surface (the magnetic pole fixed inside)24,26,27, which is called the point-contact type. The MR finishing method based on the point-contact type is often used for polishing complex shape workpieces due to its small polishing tool. The polishing films can be formed on the polishing disc by the MR polishing fluid having a or a few area contacts with the workpiece surface (many small magnetic poles clustered)15,28,29, which is called area-contact type. This method based on the area-contact type is often used for polishing large-size workpieces due to the large polishing tool.

It can be seen that the common feature of the existing MR finishing is that a flexible polishing tool is formed on the surface of the polishing wheel/ball or disk under the coupling of the magnetic field and MR polishing fluid. The shortcomings of the existing MR finishing based on the point-contact or area-contact type is that the structure/shape/size of the polishing tool can not be adjusted. Therefore, for the workpieces with a small size and complex shapes, the polishing tools of existing MR finishing can not make effective contact with the workpiece surface due to their shape/size limitations. The MR finishing methods have become a technical bottleneck restricting its practical application, and its structural principle and polishing ability can not meet the needs of ultra-precision polishing of artificial screw/nut with small size and complex shape.

Different from the previous MR finishing methods, this paper presents an ultrasonic assisted magnetorheological finishing (UMRF) excited by a three-pole magnetic field generator, where the magnetic field can be extended into the tiny space by the brush wires with the permeability and the flexibility. The UMRF device consists of a magnetic field generator, an ultrasonic vibrator, a roller, some iron rods, and some brush wires. The MR polishing fluids are sealed in the roller, and are magnetized under the combined excitation of the magnetized brush wires and the applied magnetic field. Therefore, a lots of small brushes are formed on the surface of brush wires (called polishing brushes). It is easy for polishing brushes to reach the tiny space of workpieces. Moreover, polishing brushes can maintain a good fit with different curvature surfaces. Besides, it is beneficial for the workpiece to avoid or reduce being damaged due to the flexibility of polishing brushes.

Ultrasonic vibration technology with simple equipment, low cost, and strong versatility has been successfully applied in various industries for many years21,30,31. However, it has the shortcomings of uncontrollable material removal, low surface quality, and low efficiency. MR finishing technology has the advantages of high surface quality, controllable material removal, and high efficiency32,33, but it has certain requirements for the shape/size of the workpieces, and it is difficult to process the workpiece with small size and complex shape. Compared with the above polishing method, the innovation of this article is mainly manifested as following. First of all, the flexible polishing brushes will not produce compressive stress on the surface layer of the workpiece and they can reach tiny spaces, which can reduce or eliminate the dead end that can't be polished and obtain a high surface quality. Secondly, the hardness of the MR brushes can be controlled by adjusting the applied current, obtaining controllable material removal rates. Furthermore, a set of workpieces may be polished simultaneously by a set of polishing brush wires with the assistance of ultrasonic vibration, which can obtain high efficiency. Therefore, it is foreseeable that the UMRF method could help satisfy the ultra-precision polishing of artificial screw/nut. Moreover, this study will greatly promote the further development and practical application of MR finishing. During the research process, the mechanism of material removal of the UMRF method was first studied and analyzed. Subsequently, a UMRF device was fabricated and tested to verify the feasibility of the UMRF method. Finally, the influence of the different process parameters on the surface roughness and the material removal rate of the UMRF were examined by single-factor experiments and optimized by orthogonal experiments.

The principle and experimental setup in this paper is similar to that used in our former report30, as shown in Fig. 1. The main parts of the setup are composed of a spindle, brush wires, iron rods, a roller, a three-pole magnetic field generator, and a ultrasonic vibrator. The MR polishing fluids and the workpieces were placed between the spindle and the roller. The flexible and magnetic brush wires and the iron rod were fixed in the spindle and the roller, respectively. The spindle and the roller are driven by two motors to rotate oppositely. The brush wires and the MR polishing fluids will both be magnetized under the applied magnetic field, and the magnetized MR polishing fluids will form chain structures on the magnetized brush wires. If a proper relative movement between the roller and the spindle happens, the relative movement between the workpiece and the magnetic brush will be generated and the abrasives in the polishing brushes can remove the material on the workpiece surface. To generate enough magnetic field in the MR polishing fluid of polishing region, a three-pole magnetic field generator was designed. The copper wire with the diameter of 1.25 mm and the maximum input current of 5 A was wound in the pole with 1080 turns. The diameter of the roller was 90 mm. The iron core and the spindle were made of electromagnetic pure iron (DT4C) chosen due to high magnetic permeability and saturation magnetic induction.

The schematic diagram of the experimental setup.

In the UMRF method, polishing brushes, abrasives, and workpieces are in contact with each other. According to Preston equation34,35, the workpiece surface is mainly subjected to normal force Fn and shear force Fs under the action of magnetic chains when the relative movement between the workpiece and the magnetic brush happens, as shown in Fig. 2. Fn can cause the abrasives to indent on the surface of the workpiece. Fs mainly plays a role in the micro-cutting on the workpiece surface. Rs is the friction force. The stronger the magnetic field, the higher the shear resistance of the magnetic chains will be. Therefore, the cutting ability of abrasives is mainly determined by the depth at which the abrasive particles are pressed by Fn. If Fs is higher than Rs, the abrasives will move and the peaks of surface will be removed. In addition, When the shear force Fs is less than the friction force Rs, the abrasives will roll or slip relative tothe workpiece surface. The normal force Pn (N/m2) can be mainly expressed by the magnetic field pressure Pm (N/m2) and the impact pressure Pu (N/m2) as Ref.36

Schematic diagram of polishing process mechanism of UMRF.

To formulate a microstructure based constitutive model of the MR polishing fluid and to avoid complexity, the following assumptions are made:

All the particles of carbon iron powders and abrasives are made of the same spheres with identical diameter and uniformly dispersed in the MR polishing fluid.

The magnetic field produced by the magnetized carbonyl iron powder is not considered.

Magnetic leakage and magnetic loss are not considered.

The properties of MR polishing fluid do not change during polishing.

When the direction of the applied magnetic field is perpendicular to the workpiece surface, the pressure generated by a gradient magnetic field acting on the workpiece surface can be expressed as

where μ0 is the vacuum permeability (H/m), Mf is the magnetization intensity of fluid, and H is the intensity of magnetic field (A/m).

According to the theory of field-induced polarization23,38, the magnetic moment of a magnetized dipolar particle m under the applied magnetic field can be described as

where χ is the susceptibility, and r is the radius of the particle (m).

If the magnetization intensity of magnetic particle in MR polishing fluid is M and the particle volume fraction of fluid isφ, the magnetization intensity of MR polishing fluid Mf can be expressed as37,38

Combining Eqs. (2) and (4), Pm can be expressed as

Considering an angle β1 (0° ≤ β1 ≤ 90°) between the magnetic field direction and the workpiece surface due to the irregular movement of workpiece in the roller, the magnetic field force Pmf will become

The abrasives clamped by magnetic particles continuously impact the workpiece surface under the action of ultrasonic waves. The contact surface between the abrasive and the workpiece can be seen as an infinite elastic surface because the abrasive diameter is in the order of microns.

According to the Hertz contact elastic contact theory, when the abrasives strike the workpiece surface vertically, the impact pressure Pu can be expressed as

where v1 and v2 is the Poisson's ratio of abrasive and workpiece, respectively; E1 (N/m2) and E2 (N/m2) is the elastic modulus of abrasive and workpiece, respectively; ρ (kg/m3) and Vn (m/s) is the density and the impact speed of abrasive, respectively; D is the diameter of the particle (m). The propagation velocity of ultrasonic wave in MR polishing fluid under the applied magnetic field is attenuated. Assuming that the attenuation coefficient is λ and the initial sound pressure is p0 (N/m2), the impact speed Vn of the abrasive can be described as

where hx is the distance between the workpiece and the adjacent brush (m), and V1 is the propagation speed of ultrasonic wave in the MR polishing fluid (m/s).

According to the ultrasonic principle, the initial sound pressure p0 can be described as

where f is the frequency of the ultrasonic vibration (Hz), ρ0 is the material density of the polishing brush (kg/m3), and Au is the ultrasonic amplitude (m).

Combining Eqs. (7), (8), and (9), we arrive at

where K is parameters defined by

Similarly, considering the impact direction of the abrasives is not perpendicular to the surface of the workpiece and assuming their angle β2 (0° ≤ β2 ≤ 90°), as shown in Fig. 3a, the impact pressure will become

Geometry of contact of (a) the impact pressure; (b) normal force between abrasive and workpiece for UMRF.

Combining Eqs. (1), (6), and (11), the total normal force Pn exerted by the abrasive on the workpiece surface can be rewritten as

In the UMRF method, the abrasives will produce the certain indentation on the surface of workpiece under the action of positive pressure, and the central cross-section of the indentation is consistent with the outline of the abrasive particles pressed into the surface. Figure 3b shows the contact cross-section between the workpiece and the abrasive in the polishing brush. The depth and the width of indentation is defined as c (m) and d (m), respectively. The contact area is defined as A (m2). According to the Hertz contact of spherical surface, the indentation width d can be expressed as

where \(H_{BHN} = {{2P_{n} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{2P_{n} } {\pi D\left( {D - \sqrt {D^{2} - d^{2} } } \right)}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\pi D\left( {D - \sqrt {D^{2} - d^{2} } } \right)}}\) is the Brinell hardness value of the workpiece.

The indentation depth c can be calculated as

The contact area A can be expressed as

Therefore, the shear force Fs can be expressed as

where τ is the shear stress of polishing MR fluid (N/m2), which can be measured by the MR rheometer.

Combining Eqs. (5), (10), (15), and (16), we arrive at

Equation (18) shows that Fs is mainly determined by the shear stress τ of MR polishing fluid, properties of MR polishing fluids, magnetic field strength H, the propagation speed of ultrasonic wave in the MR polishing fluid V1, and the ultrasonic amplitude Au. Therefore, the MR polishing fluid properties (such as τ,φ, D), the enameled wire specification, the number of turns, the value of applied current I and ultrasonic amplitude Au, spindle speeds n1, roller speeds n2 can be designed and determined according to Eq. (17).

The polished workpieces of titanium alloy nuts (M3) were obtained from Taizhou Lihong Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd. (China). Carbon iron powders (CIPs), which are the magnetic particles, with an average particle size of 3 μm were supplied by Guangzhou Metal Materials Co., Ltd. (China). And silicon carbides (SiCs), which are abrasives, with an average particle size of 4 μm were provided from Shanghai Metal Powder Scientific Research Co., Ltd. (China).

For each polished titanium alloy nut, the surface roughness of four-point measured method was adopted, as shown in Fig. 4. There are four detection lines, which are respectively the center line and diagonal line of the workpiece surface to be detected. The surface roughness value obtained by the experiment is the average value of the measured surface roughness under the four detection lines. The process parameters have a great influence on the surface quality of the workpiece30,32. The surface topography inspection point was located in the center of the surface of the measured workpiece and the size of the acquisition point is 0.381 mm × 0.381 mm. The total magnification of the objective lens was 700 times and the observation was made in a bright field environment. Therefore, the effects of the four parameters, i.e., spindle speed n1, the roller speed n2, the ultrasonic amplitude Au, and the applied current I on the nut’s surface roughness and the change rate of surface roughness were studied by the orthogonal experimental method.

Diagram of detection point and line distribution of workpiece surface.

The first set of experiments was designed based on the single-factor experiment. Effects of spindle speed n1 at the different roller speeds n2 (50, 70, 90, and 110 r/min), ultrasonic amplitudes Au (0, 5, 10 and 15 μm), and applied currents I (2, 3, 4, and 5 A) on finishing performance have been parametrically studied.

The second set of experiments was designed based on the orthogonal experiment. In the standard L9(34) orthogonal array, four factors A, B, C, and D were defined as spindle speeds n1, roller speeds n2, ultrasonic amplitudes Au, and applied currents I, respectively. Each factor in the array had three levels. Therefore, according to different combinations of factors and their levels, nine test experiments were designed. As well as the combination of parameters was also optimized.

If the tested surface roughness is Ra, the change rate of surface roughness △Ra can be represented as

where Ra1 is the surface roughness before finishing, Ra2 is the surface roughness after finishing.

The MR polishing fluids were composed of silicone oil (38 wt%), CIPs (35 wt%), SiCs (23 wt%), and additives (C18H35NaO2, OP-10, 4 wt%). The morphology of CIP and SiC mixed were shown in Fig. 5a. Figure 5b was taken at 7000 magnification. It shows clearly that the CIP particles were nearly spherical with an average particles size of approximately 3 µm, whereas SiC particles were polygon in shape with sharp edges and an average particles size of about 4 μm. The sharp edges were more useful for cutting the workpiece.

SEM images of CIP and SiC mixed together.

Single-factor experiments were designed to explore the influence of various process parameters on the surface roughness and the change rates of surface roughness of the workpiece. The curves of surface roughness Ra and the change rates of surface roughness △Ra at different spindle speeds n1, roller speeds n2, ultrasonic amplitudes Au, and applied currents I were shown in Fig. 6. As shown in Fig. 6a,b, Ra exhibited a decreasing trend with the increase of n2 as the spindle speeds n1 gradually increased under Au = 10 μm, I = 3 A, and t = 80 min. In detail, the surface roughness showed a Ramin of 0.293 μm at n1 = 240 r/min with a n2 of 110 r/min. Ra showed a decreasing trend with the increase of Au under I = 3 A, n2 = 110 r/min, and t = 80 min except for Au = 15 μm, as shown in Fig. 6c,d. It indicates an improved Ramin value of 0.276 μm at n1 = 240 r/min and Au = 10 μm. Figure 6e,f also presented a decreasing trend of Ra with the increase of applied current under Au = 10 μm, n2 = 110 r/min, and t = 80 min except for I = 5 A. While an improved Ramin value of 0.206 μm happened at n1 = 240 r/min with a applied current of 4 A, which was superior to that with a applied current of 3 A, compared with Fig. 6a,b.

The Ra and △Ra versus n1 under different n2 (a,b,g,h); Au (c,d,i,j); I (e,f,k,l), respectively.

The corresponding change rates of surface roughness △Ra were shown in Fig. 6g,h. It shows The trends of △Ra are the opposite of those of Ra. △Ra steadily increased with the increase of the spindle speed n1 at different roller speeds n2, as shown in Fig. 6g,h. When n2 was 110 r/min, △Ra increased from 62.85 to 76.72% with the increase of n1 from 120 r/min to 240 r/min. △Ra exhibited a similarly increasing trend at different Au and I, except for Au = 15 μm and I = 5 A, respectively, as shown in Fig. 6i,j. The change rates of surface roughness showed a △Ramax of 76.72% at n1 = 240 r/min with Au of 10 μm. An improved △Ramax value of 83.29% at n1 = 240 r/min with an applied current of 4 A. However, when Au = 15 μm, △Ra increased from 65.45% to 71.93% in the spindle speed n1 from 120 r/min to 160 r/min, then decreased to 68.69% with the further increase in n1 to 240 r/min, as shown in Fig. 6i,j. When I = 5 A, △Ra slightly decreased from 75.75% to 73.79% in the spindle speed n1 from 120 r/min to 240 r/min, as shown in Fig. 6k,l.

These results indicate that the initial polishing process parameter combination in the single-factor experiments could be obtained as n1 = 240 r/min, n2 = 110 r/min, Au = 10 μm, and I = 4A.

Generally, the surface before finishing is relatively rough with the convex peaks and burrs. The increasing of n2 inevitably leads to enlarging the relative speed between polishing abrasive and workpiece, resulting in the increase of the number of contacts between polishing abrasive and workpiece. Thus, the greater n2 will lead to a lower Ra and a higher △Ra, as shown in Fig. 6a,g. The material removal process of MR polishing is mostly completed by shearing behavior of the abrasive on the workpiece surface. However, the shear force of abrasives can be enhanced by the surface of the workpiece is impacted by ultrasonic vibration, which results in a lower Ra and a higher η, as shown in Fig. 6c,i. If Au is too great, the impact pressure will deepen the indentation depth of the abrasives on the workpiece surface. As a consequence, new scratches or pits will be generated on the surface of the workpiece, resulting in a higher Ra and a lower η. As everyone knows, the shear force of MR fluid increases with the increase of the applied magnetic field or current. Therefore, the magnitude of clamping force of magnetic particles on abrasives mainly depends on the magnitude of the applied current. The higher the applied current, the higher the shear force of abrasives, and the more effectively the material can be removed, as shown in Fig. 6e,k. Similar to the effect of Au on Ra, the extreme current leads to the excessive shear force, resulting in the new scratches on the surface of workpiece. As a consequence, this generates a slightly increase in Ra.

According to the single-factor experimental results, a set of initial optimized polishing process parameters were obtained. Based on the orthogonal analysis method39, a L9(34) orthogonal array was designed by selecting the initial optimized parameters, as listed in Table 1. In this array, four factors A, B, C, and D were defined as spindle speeds n1, roller speeds n2, ultrasonic amplitudes Au, and applied currents I, respectively. Each factor in the array had three levels. The orthogonal test method can analyze the combined effects of multiple factors with fewer tests39. Therefore, the total nine experiments were designed and tested according to different combinations of factors and their levels. The orthogonal experimental results of workpiece final Ra and ΔRa in different test runs for four factors were also summarized in Table 1. The average initial Ra of Titanium alloy nuts was about 1.233 μm.

The results of the orthogonal tests are shown in Table 2, in which K and G represents the means of the surface roughness Ra after polished measured below the same level of the column parameters and that of the corresponding change rate of surface roughness ΔRa, respectively. R represents the range, which is used to characterize the influence degree of each factor on the respective indices. According to Table 2, R was taken as the index.

The range values of four factors in the orthogonal experiment are shown in Fig. 7. For Ra, Fig. 7a shows that the range of applied current was the largest, followed by the roller speed and the spindle speed, and the ultrasonic amplitude was the smallest. Therefore, it could be deduced that the influence of each factor on the Ra is I (0.06) > n2 (0.021) > Au (0.018) > n1 (0.015). For the change rate of surface roughness ΔRa, Fig. 7b depicts that the range of applied current was still the largest, followed by the roller speed. However, the next order was the spindle speed and the ultrasonic amplitude, which was different from that on Ra. Therefore, it could be deduced that the range R of each factor on ΔRa could be expressed as I (4.7) > n2 (2.81) > n1 (1.56) > Au (0.29). In brief, it is found that the applied current and the roller speed both significantly had the greater effects on Ra and ΔRa, the spindle speed and the ultrasonic amplitude had a less effect.

Range of Ra (a) and ΔRa (b) for factors of A (n1), B (n2), C (Au), and D (I).

The analysis of level mean response is commonly used to examine the influence of various factors on the target at different levels to find the optimal combination of conditions to achieve the best results40. In this orthogonal experiment, the effects of four parameters of level mean response on Ra and ΔRa were illustrated in Fig. 8.

The effects of four parameters of level mean response on Ra and ΔRa.

Figure 8a indicates that the spindle speed had great influences both on Ra and ΔRa. Ra and ΔRa were both promoted with the spindle speed increasing. It seems that the higher value of spindle speed should be better. This is mainly because the high spindle speed led to more contact between the workpiece surface and the abrasive. Moreover, if the spindle speed was too great, the larger micro-cutting depth would be achieved by the abrasives caused by significant centrifugal force. However, the stability of the entire experimental polishing device became worse under n1 = 280 r/min. Therefore, it is appropriate in the present paper to choose the value of n1 = 260 r/min.

Figure 8b indicates that the roller speed significantly contributed to the decrease of Ra and increase of ΔRa under n2 = 120 r/min. Differently, Ra was continuously improved with the increase of roller speed, however, ΔRa became worse under n2 = 140 r/min. This might be due to the relative speed between the polishing brush and the workpiece. This relative speed would certainly be enlarged due to the increase in roller speed. Generally, the greater relative speed would result in the higher material removal. However, the total number of abrasives in the MR polishing fluid decreased in the UMRF because some of them were thrown to the outer edge of the roller by centrifugal force under the higher roller speed. Therefore, the value of roller speed should be chosen not too high or not too low. It is appropriate in the present paper to choose the value of n2 = 120 r/min.

Figure 8c indicates that the ultrasonic amplitude had a great influence both on Ra and ΔRa under Au = 10 μm. However, Ra and ΔRa did not significantly contribute to the increase but got worse with the increasing Au. This was probably because the large ultrasonic vibration could lead to the high shear and friction force of abrasives on the peak and valley of workpiece surface. But the larger the ultrasonic vibration was applied, the deeper the micro-cutting depth and the worse the surface roundness due to the new scratches or pits. Therefore, it is appropriate in the present paper to choose the value of Au = 10 μm, which agrees with the other results40.

Figure 8d indicates that the applied current had a large influence on improving both Ra and ΔRa under I = 4 A while worse under the applied current of 5 A. This might be due to the high applied current leading to the great clamping force of magnetic particles on abrasives. Generally, the higher the current was applied, the greater the shear force was achieved on the polishing brush. However, if the applied current was too high, excessive shear force would be produced, which could lead to a deeper micro-cutting depth on the workpiece surface. Therefore, it is appropriate in the present paper to choose the value of I = 4 A.

Summarizing the above, to achieve the good Ra and the high ΔRa, the optimal combination of process parameters was selected as n1 = 240 r/min, n2 = 120 r/min, Au = 10 μm, and I = 4 A in this study.

The finishing experiments of UMRF were performed on titanium alloy nuts under the optimal process parameters. The workpieces were machined four times for a total of 80 min. The typical surface morphologies and the surface roughness, which were characterized using an ultra-depth-of-field microscope (Olympus DSX1000, Japan) and surface roughometer (CH80, China), were shown in Fig. 9. Figure 9a,b show that the initial surface morphology with amount of micro/nano peak-valley structures was greatly and effectively improved under optimal process parameters, although there are still relatively shallow/less valleys in the final surface. The value of Ra was decreased from an initial 1.247 μm to a final 0.104 μm, as shown in Fig. 9c,d, respectively. A measured result of Ra under the optimal process parameters of n1 = 240 r/min, n2 = 120 r/min, Au = 10 μm, and I = 4 A. is shown in Fig. 10.

Comparison of surface morphology and measured surface roughness before polishing (a) and (c), and after polishing (a) and (c), respectively.

Ra versus t for optimal process conditions and control experiments.

In this study, an ultrasonic assisted magnetorheological finishing (UMRF) device was used with a custom three-pole excitation electromagnet to polish the titanium alloys with a small size and complex shapes. The force model was established based on the Preston equation to analyze the mechanism of material removal in the UMRF process. A series of single-factor experiments were designed and performed on titanium alloy nuts (M3). The results showed that the initial optimal polishing process parameter combination were n1 = 240 r/min, n2 = 110 r/min, Au = 10 μm, and I = 4A. Further, orthogonal experiments were designed and performed based on the parameters obtained by the single-factor experiments. The results indicated the effect on Ra and ΔRa as I > n1 > Au > n2 and I > n1 > n2 > Au, respectively. Under these optimal process parameters of n1 = 240 r/min, n2 = 120 r/min, Au = 10 μm, and I = 4A, the surface roughness was reduced from 1.247 μm to 0.104 μm after the polishing for 80 min. It is foreseeable that UMRF is a highly adaptable and efficient method for polishing titanium alloy with a small size and complex shapes.

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.

Hashmi, A. W. et al. A comprehensive review on surface post-treatments for freeform surfaces of bio-implants. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 23, 4866–4908 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ni, J. et al. 3D-printed Ti6Al4V femoral component of knee: Improvements in wear and biological properties by AIP TiN and TiCrN coating. J. Market. Res. 14, 2322–2332 (2021).

CAS Google Scholar

Costa, T. N. Q., Dotta, T. C., Galo, R., Soares, M. E. C. & Pedrazzi, V. Effect of tribocorrosion on surface-treated titanium alloy implants: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 145, 106008 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hussein, M. B., Mustafa, A. M., Abdulkareem, M. H. & Alamiery, A. A. Comparative corrosion performance of YSZ-coated Ti-13Zr-13Nb alloy and commercially pure titanium in orthopedic implants. South Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 48, 40–54 (2024).

Article Google Scholar

Dwivedi, S., Dixit, A. R., Das, A. K. & Adamczuk, K. Additive texturing of metallic implant surfaces for improved wetting and biotribological performance. J. Market. Res. 20, 2650–2667 (2022).

CAS Google Scholar

Hou, N. et al. Fundamental functions of physical and chemical principles in the polishing of titanium alloys: Mechanisms and problems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 118, 2079–2097 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Muthaiah, V. M. S., Indrakumar, S., Suwas, S. & Chatterjee, K. Surface engineering of additively manufactured titanium alloys for enhanced clinical performance of biomedical implants: A review of recent developments. Bioprinting 25, e00180 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, H., Bi, C., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L. & Zhou, F. Compressions of magnetorheological fluids under instantaneous magnetic field and constant area. Sci. Rep. 11, 8887 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar

Bi, C. et al. A comparative analysis of measured and calculated compressive stresses of magnetorheological fluids under unidirectional compression and constant area. Materials 15, 3057 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar

Tian, J. et al. Study on mechanism of improving efficiency of permanent-magnet small ball-end magnetorheological polishing by increasing magnetorheological fluid temperature. Sci. Rep. 12, 7705 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar

Wang, H. & Bi, C. Study of a magnetorheological brake under compression-shear mode. Smart Mater. Struct. 29, 017001 (2020).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Ankur, Vaishya, R., Kumar, V. The effect of process parameters on the microsurface finish of magnetorheological fluid technology: A review Research. J. Sci. Technol. 13, 23–30 (2021).

Wang, H., Bi, C., Zhang, Y., Ji, A. & Qiu, P. Transient behavior of compressed magnetorheological brake excited by step currents. Sci. Rep. 11, 12193 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar

Ghosh, G., Sidpara, A. & Bandyopadhyay, P. P. Performance improvement of magnetorheological finishing using chemical etchant and diamond-graphene based magnetic abrasives. Precis. Eng. 79, 221–235 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Guo, Y. et al. A novel high efficiency magnetorheological polishing process excited by Halbach array magnetic field. Precis. Eng. 74, 175–185 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, H. et al. An experimental study on mechanical properties of a magnetorheological fluid under slow compression. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 34(19), 2307–2318 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Chen, C. C., Chen, J. H. & Chao, C. G. Electrochemical characteristics of surface of titanium formed by electrolytic polishing and anodized. J. Mater. Sci. 40, 4053–4058 (2005).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Balasundaram, T. & Raja, K. Study of well-structured titanium nanotubes anodesynthesisfor solar cell applicationby electrochemical anodization method. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 7(1), 113–118 (2015).

Google Scholar

Qian, C. et al. A review on magnetic abrasive finishing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 112, 619–34 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Kaushik, A., Singh, P., Kumar, H. & Singh, L. Experimental comparison of unbonded, agglutinated and sintered SiC-based magnetic abrasive particles in magnetic abrasive finishing process. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 587, 171294 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Meng, F. et al. Profile prediction for ultrasonic vibration polishing of alumina ceramics. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 252, 108360 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Li, S. et al. Surface formation modeling and surface integrity research of normal ultrasonic assisted flexible abrasive belt grinding. J. Manuf. Processes. 80, 232–246 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, H., Bi, C., Wang, Y. & Zhang, Z. Normalized structure parameter of magnetorheological fluids under unidirectional monotonous squeeze. Mater. Today Commun. 36, 106635 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Niranjan, M. S. & Jha, S. Flow behaviour of bidisperse MR polishing fluid and ball end MR finishing. Proc. Mater. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.096 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, H., Bi, C., Liu, W. & Zhou, F. Squeeze behaviors of magnetorheological fluids under different compressive speeds. Materials 16, 3109 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar

Lee, J. W. et al. Polishing characteristics of optical glass using PMMA-coated carbonyl-iron-based magnetorheological fluid. Smart Mater. Struct. 24(6), 065002 (2015).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Mosavat, M. & Rahimi, A. Numerical-experimental study on polishing of silicon wafer using magnetic abrasive finishing process. Wear 424, 143–150 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Pan, J., Yan, Q., Lu, J., Xu, X. & Chen, S. Cluster magnetorheological effect plane polishing technology. J. Mech. Eng. 50(1), 205–12 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Pan, J., Zheng, K., Yan, Q., Zhang, Q. & Lu, J. Optimization study on magnetorheological fluid workpieces and process parameters of cluster magnetorheological finishing with dynamic magnetic field for sapphire substrates. Smart Mater. Struct. 29(11), 114009 (2020).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Bi, C. et al. Investigation on roller-type ultrasonic assisted magnetorheological finishing for biomedical small and complex surface of titanium alloy. Mater. Today Commun. 38, 107702 (2024).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Zhan, J., Jin, R. & Tao, M. Oblique ultrasonic polishing method by robot for free-form surfaces. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40(6), 795–808 (2000).

Article Google Scholar

Luo, H. et al. An atomic-scale and high efficiency finishing method of zirconia ceramics by using magnetorheological finishing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 444, 569–577 (2018).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Rajput, A. S., Das, M. & Kapil, S. Investigations on a hybrid chemo-magnetorheological finishing process for freeform surface quality enhancement. J. Manuf. Process. 81, 522–536 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Luo, Q., Ramarajan, S. & Babu, S. V. Modification of the Preston equation for the chemical mechanical polishing of copper. Thin Solid Films 335(1–2), 160–167 (1998).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Yoshio, H. Dynamical mechanism of chemical mechanical polishing analyzed to correct Preston’s empirical model. J. Electrochem. Soc. 153(6), G587–G590 (2006).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, F. H., Wang, H. J. & Luan, D. R. Research on machining mechanics and experiment of ultrasonic-magnetorheological compound finishing. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. 29(2–4), 252 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bi, C. et al. Magnetic circuit design for the performance experiment of shear yield stress enhanced by compression of magnetorheological fluids. Sci. Rep. 14, 741 (2024).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar

Peng, X. & Li, H. Analysis of the magnetomechanical behavior of MRFs based on micromechanics incorporating a statistical approach. Smart Mater. Struct. 16, 2477–2485 (2007).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Chen, S., Jin, E., Xu, G., Zhuo, S. & Chen, X. Factors influencing the low-temperature properties of styrene-butadiene-styrene modified asphalt based on orthogonal tests. Polymers 15(1), 52 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Choopani, Y., Razfar, M. R., Khajehzadeh, M. & Khosrojerdi, M. Design and development of ultrasonic assisted-rotational magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (UA-RMRAFF) process. Appl. Acoust. 197, 108950 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Download references

This work has been sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51205367), Science Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2014C31090), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. ZCLY24E0501), and Science and Technology Plan Project of Taizhou (Grant No. 23gya04).

School of Intelligent Manufacture, Taizhou University, Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China

Cheng Bi, Axiang Ji, Hongyun Wang, Haibo Wang & Fenfen Zhou

Technique Department, Zhejiang Feiya Elevator Co. Ltd, Jinhua, China

Junhua Zhu

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Conceptualization, all authors; investigation, C.B., and A.J.; data curation, A.J., and H.W.; formal analysis, C.B., and A.J.; methodology, H.W., and J.Z.; supervision: C.B., and H.W.; writing—review and editing, A.J., F.Z., J.Z., and H.W.; visualization, H.W., and A.J.,. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Correspondence to Hongyun Wang.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

Bi, C., Ji, A., Wang, H. et al. Improvement of roughness in ultrasonic assisted magnetorheological finishing of small titanium alloy nuts by orthogonal test method. Sci Rep 14, 9311 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60153-z

Download citation

Received: 06 February 2024

Accepted: 19 April 2024

Published: 23 April 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60153-z

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative